Thematics
Innobarometer - Impact of innovation
demand
Sophisticated consumer demand should be an important
driver for innovation products and services. One
thesis is that firms primarily benefit from sophisticated
consumer demand in their domestic market, while
an alternative view is that export-oriented firms
can build on sophisticated consumer demand in their
foreign markets.
The 2005
Innobarometer provides
a measure of innovation demand, based on a survey
of 30,000 Europeans in the 25 Member States plus
Bulgaria , Romania and Turkey . A set of questions
was asked to identify how European citizens feel
attracted by innovative products or services. Their
replies characterise the demand for innovation
from customers, an element that is generally only
approximated through inappropriate indicators.
Innovative products or services were described
as new or improved ones. For the first time, a
typology based on attractiveness to innovative
products or services is proposed for all Member
States leading to 4 categories for EU-25 citizens
(see Figure 14):
- 11%
are enthusiasts towards innovation Pro-innovation
--------------> pro-innovation
- 39% are attracted by innovation ------------------------------------------>
pro-innovation
- 33% are reluctant to innovation
- 16% are anti-innovation
Figure 14. Innobarometer
2005: Typology on innovation

|
The results indicate that Europe is evenly split
between those attracted by innovation – those that
are pro-innovation – and those more or less reluctant.
Malta , Slovakia , Romania and Italy are countries
with the highest proportion of pro-innovation citizens.
However there is no clear gap with the following
countries. On the other side, the typology analysis
shows that citizens in Poland , Latvia , Germany
and Finland are least ready to embrace innovation.
The concept of pro-innovation is of interest as
it could be an explaining factor for the differences
in the transformation of innovation inputs into
innovation outputs as described in section 2.4.
The EIS 2005 indeed provides first clues of this
relationship.
The case of countries with the highest proportion
of pro-innovation citizens ( Malta , Slovakia ,
Romania , Italy and France) is characteristic as
these countries all have better results for the
output indicators of the EIS than for the input
indicators if compared with European trend. More
generally; among the 10 countries having the highest
share of pro-innovation population, 9 have an output/input
rate above the EU trend (Figure 7). Conversely,
7 countries among the 10 where the population readiness
for innovation is the lowest have a below average
output/input ratio. Significant exceptions in this
last category are Germany and Austria , where results
may indicate that the drivers for innovation
do not lie in the public demand but rather come
from the side of the firm.
|